Jews were killed in Europe accused to “stabbing” the Communion bread, an act of killing the “Pope’s Messiah”.
The online Magazine “Jewish Ideas Daily” is again raising the issue of Catholics persecuting Jews during the Inquisition, accusing them of “killing Jesus”
How?
By Stabbing the bread of the “Holy Communion”claimed to contain a physical “Jesus”.
The Jewish magazine reminds the readers about an event in Malaysia in May 2009, that show the implications of Catholic teachings:
Two years ago, a Muslim reporter for the Malaysian magazine Al Islam attended a Catholic mass in Kuala Lumpur with a companion, surreptitiously took communion, and put the wafer in his mouth, only to spit it out later. The May 2009 issue of Al Islam featured a cover photograph of the soggy, partially-eaten wafer—to the horror of local church authorities outraged at this desecration of the sacramental host, held by Roman Catholics to be the actual trans-substantiated body of Jesus. A complaint was lodged with the police, demanding investigation and redress.
Source: Jewish Ideas Daily:
The Catholic doctrine of transsubstantiation makes the bread used in “The Holy Communion” more than a bread. The Catholic priest claims to be capable of taking the physical Jesus out of Heaven, and put him into the bread at the altar in Roman Catholic Church. The Papal priests teach that those who eat “Him” receives Him.
During the Middle Ages, the Roman Catholics accused Jews of “killing Jesus”. Jews were captured and slaughtered accused of stealing, stabbing or destroying the round wafer used in the communion.
Such insane accusations, lead to pogroms and mass murders of Jews in several European cities.
True followers of Jesus, rebukes the Roman Catholics, and refuse to participate in the Vatican promoted “Holy Communion”. Simply because we do not believe priestly cannibalism will please Jesus. The fruits of this blasphemy against Jesus, leads to acts of insanity.
What is the Bible saying about “eating flesh”?
Like the Pope, some claimed students of Jesus, did not understand that Jesus was trying to explain to them.
John 6:5
Then the Jews began to argue sharply among themselves, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”
Jesus rebuked them and explained that to eat “his flesh” is to obey His Words.
John 6:63
The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you—they are full of the Spirit and life.
True followers of the Jewish Messiah believe that the Church is His body on Earth, and His Words the bread of life. We are called to brake physical bread and share it, in remembrance of Him. To accept Jesus, is more than anything to embrace His teachings, and make Him the boss of your life. He has called us to be under the His Lordship. He is our Master Jesus.
Written by Ivar
First published 5th of May, 2011.
ivarfjeld.com 
It is possible to make Jesus the boss of your life and follow His words without “receiving” Him. Some Catholics do this.
To “receive” Jesus is to believe ON Him. Many people believe IN Jesus. They believe in their minds all they have learned of Him. But to believe ON Jesus is to come to the place where you trust in His shed blood AND NOTHING ELSE for your salvation.
You may look at a chair and believe that it will hold you. But when you sit in the chair, and entrust yourself to it, you believe ON the chair.
To believe ON Jesus is to put your trust in His shed blood as the ONLY THING that will save your eternal soul. Not Jesus plus baptism. Not Jesus plus obedience. Jesus ONLY. Jesus called this being born again. His Spirit comes to live within us, and our dead spirit is made alive.
Be sure you are trusting in Jesus only and not in anything else for your salvation!
Amen
Flower, what do you say to those who say they believe in Jesus, but they are not obedient? It is not enough to say you believe in Jesus, even the demons know there is One God. Yes, saved when we believe, but we also have to obey.
What is it to say we believe in Jesus? It means we believe in Jesus and all that he says.
The men who established the Catholic Church were there with Jesus, at the Last Supper. They knew exactly what Jesus meant, and they passed that knowledge on to their duly authorized successors.
Anyone who relies on a book … even a holy book, like the Bible … for all they claim to know and understand about the genuine Christian faith, is bound to come to many, many totally wrong conclusions … simply because the Bible contains only scant details about many, many important subjects … and no details at all about others.
Why not simply admit the fact that you have no personal knowledge about the divine institution of the Holy Eucharist, and simply accept what the Catholic Church … the only living eye-witness to Jesus Christ, on this earth … has always taught about it?
You have no idea what you’re missing!
And thank you, Doug Lawrence for removing any doubts about your church and its devilish doctrines.
****the only living eye-witness to Jesus Christ,*****
Really ? someone in the RCC is 2000 years old ?
(maybee i don’t get it … )
The Jesus of the RCC is a dead Jesus, see your crucifix,that are nothing else than satanic trophy, and you worship them.
Wake up !!!
Shabbat Shalom.
Dear Helene.
Shalom.
You wrote:
The Jesus of the RCC is a dead Jesus, see your crucifix,that are nothing else than satanic trophy, and you worship them.
Wake up !!!
My comment:
I once heard about a kind of people who are very difficult to counter. “Bible believing not born again Christians”. There are many things such people do not understand. But they seems to have one thing in common.They recognize the Pope as a Christian leader, and they feel unity with Rome is desirable.
Thank you Ivar for speaking out the TRUTH; God bless you.
“”””The Papal priests teach that those who eat “Him” receives Him.””””
Does someone knows, why they don’t share the wine, they don’t ” drink their jesus “?
Why do the priest use white wine , cut with watter ?
Raised as Roman catholic, i’ve often ask …i’ve never had answers…
(I was a Bad Catholic…i never really believed that
Jesus could be in a biscuit…to finish in… the wc )
Shabbat Shalom 🙂
“look up, and lift up our head; for our redemption draweth nigh.”
Under what authority do most Protestants reject the words of Jesus? They claim that the bread and wine offered by the Catholic priest at the Holy Mass is nothing more than a symbol of the body and blood of Christ. They reject the Sacred Words of Jesus who clearly said that when you eat the Bread, you are eating His Body, and when you drink the Wine, you are actually drinking his blood. How can they say that it is symbolic when Jesus said that it is not symbolic?
By rejecting the necessity to eat the Body and drink the Blood of Christ, they reject the Christian truth that the Body and Blood of Christ are necessary for eternal life.
Very few times in the Holy Bible does Jesus say “Very truly…” These two words mean, “Pay attention and believe!” Jesus spoke these two words when he made reference to his body and blood.
The transformation of the Bread and Wine into the Body and Blood of Christ are problematic for the Protestant. These are the same words that were problematic with the many disciples who left Jesus. [Jn. 6:66-67] As Jesus said to those who abandonned him, he says to the Protestants who reject his Words, “Do you also wish to go away?” They claim to be Christians but yet they rejects the Words of Jesus who is the Head of the Church. Surely, they cannot belong to the Church that was instituted by Jesus! Their association is with a man-made religion that was not instituted by Christ, nor approved by Christ.
Dear Taylor.
Shalom, and welcome to this site.
Jesus did not tap blood from his arm, and told his disciples to drink it. You do not have to be a racer and super intelligent to understand, that Jesus was not a cannibal, and do not want you to become one.
Since the blood of Jesus obviously was inside his body and not in the cup, Jesus did speak about two kinds of blood. One that He would shed hanging on the cross, and one that we are invited to drink from the cup when we remember the last supper in fellowship with other Christians.
The blood of Jesus that was shed for my sins on the cross redeems me from all sins. The wine (blood of the new covenant) I drink when I remember Him, reminds me about the blood that saved me 2.000 years ago.
Why is it so difficult to understand and accept this for Roman Catholics?
Is it simply because the Pope has said so, you feel you have to promote Vatican inspired cannibalism?
Why is difficult to believe that bread and wine can transform into the body and blood of Christ, since everything through Christ Jesus, the Son of God and second person in the Holy Trinity….anything is possible through God and His Son!!! Is that right or wrong??
Kelly,
it is wrong…anything is possible but not through HIS SON. you are missing SOMEONE. the theology is not that simple.
besides, transubstantiation is never supported by the bible. no power exists for that. look for it in the bible. look it up in the teachings of the apostles. ask the LORD to give you wisdom from above.
Dear Kelly,
In John 6, Jesus equates coming to Him and believing in Him to eating and drinking.
When Jesus left earth, He gave us the Holy Spirit to come live inside of us. Why do we need more Jesus in bread, if He already lives inside believers??
Also, you would agree there is one incarnation, right? Jesus in the flesh. But to believe in transubstantiation is believing that Jesus in His one incarnation is sitting at the right hand of the Father as scripture says, and in a million hosts. That means there is more than one incarnation which is heretical.
The Catholic Church, does not teach that the sacrifice of the Mass is another sacrifice in addition to Calvary or a recrucifixion of Christ or worship another Christ incarnate. Rather, it is a re-presenting of Christ’s original sacrifice, making it present to all Christians in all places and at all times. The sacrifice of Calvary and the sacrifice of the Mass are one and the same sacrifice, the manner in which they are offered is alone different.
The sacrifice of Christ was accomplished once in time but to God it is an event eternally present before Him. This is gathered from St. John’s words in the Book of Revelation: “And all that dwell upon the earth adored him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb, which was slain from the beginning of the world” (13, 8 [Douai]). In heaven, Christ still bears the appearance of a victim: “And between the throne and the four living creatures and among the elders, I saw a Lamb standing, as though it had been slain” (Rev. 5, 6). The Mass slices through time and re-presents this eternal sacrifice before us so all Christians may eat the flesh of the Eternal Lamb after it has been slain.
Even St. Paul the Apostle, teaches the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist in his Letter to First Corinthians 10:16-21
“16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not a participation in the Blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the Body of Christ? Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread. Consider the people of Israel; are not those who eat the sacrifices partners in the altar? What do I imply then? That food offered to idols is anything, or that an idol is anything? No, I imply that what pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God. I do not want you to be partners with demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. 21 You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons.”
Kelly,
If you believe that Jesus is sitting at the right hand of the Father then how is He also in a million different hosts locked in tabernacles around the world?
That means there is more than one body of Jesus if every time you receive the host and the priest says “body of Christ.”
The Eucharist can mold and corrupt if not eaten. Yet scripture says His body will never ever be corrupt:
Acts 2:31
he foresaw and spoke about the resurrection of the Christ, that he was not abandoned to Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption.
If Jesus said “It is finished,” and sat down at the right hand of the Father to show it is finished, why does the RCC repeat it over and over as if it is not finished? The RCC says that your “venial” sins are forgiven at the mass and that it is a continuing sacrifice. There is NO MORE sacrifice for sin. The RCC also says to lift up the people’s sufferings with the sacrifice of the mass. Wasn’t His blood enough? His blood IS ENOUGH to SAVE, to cleanse all sin. It’s an insult and blasphemy to add to the finished work of Christ by adding the people’s sufferings with His.
“This is my body…this is the cup of my blood…do this in remembrance of me.” Like 22
Responding in obedience, the Catholic Church perpetuates the memory of the Passover banquet that Christ celebrated with his disciples. In the Mass, the Last Supper subsists through the words and actions done in imitation of Christ.
When we “remember Jesus” at the Eucharist, we move from our chronological past-present-future kind of time and pass over into God’s own “time of salvation” where past-present-future merge into God’s eternal now. When we sing, “Were you there when they crucified my Lord?” the presumed answer is, “Yes, I was there!” Indeed, we are there now!
Thus recalling the mysteries of redemption, it opens up to the faithful the riches of the Lord’s powers and merits, so that these are in some way made present at all times; the faithful lay hold of them and are filled with saving grace” (Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, #102). In a real yet mysterious way we become present with the apostles at the Last Supper. We are there on Calvary. With the apostles we witness the Resurrection and the sending of the Spirit. We stand with all the angels and saints and have a foretaste of the heavenly banquet!
Each Eucharist begins with the Liturgy of the Word. Hearing the voice of Christ himself, we remember. And in that remembering we become present to the mystery of faith. We are filled with the Spirit, inspired to pledge our lives to one another and to become one body. We seal that pledge by sharing a sacred meal. And that is the subject of the next article in this series. It’s a pity that the English word “Remembrance” doesn’t come close to communicating these realities, but that doesn’t mean that the deeper and far more powerful reality isn’t there.
Dear Kelly.
Shalom, and thanks for this comment:
You wrote:
When we “remember Jesus” at the Eucharist, we move from our chronological past-present-future kind of time and pass over into God’s own “time of salvation” where past-present-future merge into God’s eternal now.
My comment:
We obviously have a problem here. One billion Catholics wants to play the murder of Jesus all over again, having him physically on the altar. One billion protestant calls this blasphemy.
To redo a brutal murder of Jesus “into God’s eternal now” is exactly what Satan would like to do. Because God of the Bible said” ITS FINISHED. Never to be repeated. Jesus is OFF the CROSS, and OUT of the GRAVE forever more. Amen.
But for the Vatican and their priests this brutal murder is not over. Rome desire to crucifying Him again, again and again, in fact 200.000 times every day all over the World.
The Roman Catholic mas is presented as a sacrifice onto God, the very re-killing of the Messiah.
The Roman Catholic priest claim they can take Jesus out of Heaven. Such priests claim they have the physical “Jesus” present, so they can crucify Him all over again, eat his physical body, drink his physical blood and celebrate.
That pagan Romans did this crime in Jerusalem 2.000 years ago, and God tells in the letter to the Hebrews NOT to repeat this. Still all Roman Catholics are forced by their priests to hail the God-mockers.
What a Satanic mas, what a shame. I pray all people will be able to see this shameful acts of wickedness, and leave this satanic copy of the Christian faith.
“This is my body…this is the cup of my blood…do this in remembrance of me.” Luke 22:19***” My bad…
Kelly.
You didn’t address my points.
Sue
The Last Supper was a Jewish Passover meal. Not a sacrifice. How can He offer a bloodless sacrifice before the atonement. There is no sacrifice without the shedding of blood. The Last SUpper was a foreshadowing of what was to come. Jesus also ate the bread. Are you saying He ate Himself? No way.
Ivar,
for a while, i have been grasping for word/words to describe some people i meet who are difficult to bring to JESUS our savior and mediator. indeed, you are right – “bible believing persons who are not born again christians” – nails it!
2Tim 3:16, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness…”
1Corinthians 2:14 says, “The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.”
the WORD OF GOD is inspired by the SPIRIT of GOD therefore in order to understand it correctly and handle the truth biblically, we need the same one who inspired it – the SPIRIT OF GOD. the problem is when only a certain group of people are considered to have the divine knowledge of scripture because of ritual or seminary they have gone through and not by the power of the SPIRIT 😦
the church of rome is led by a different spirit. they should have remembered that GOD never contradicts HIMSELF. Luke 22:19/1Co 11:24-25 should be reconciled with John 6:58 and John 6:63 in order to make one cohesive and coherent whole.
those who are still inside this church have long ago stopped questioning their teachings and just decided to swallow everything (including the so called eternal life in the wafer); no wonder their minds are darkened and they are unteacheable. they have chosen their path when they accepted that they are not worshipping or adoring graven images. they agreed that these images were just simply aids to worship when in fact the bible categorically and explicitly is against these (Exodus 20:4)!
if they can close their eyes to violations of one of the Ten Commandments which was very, very obvious and make rationalizations to their teachings, we cannot expect them to understand the spiritual things – the very things of GOD. “Leave them; they are blind guides. If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” Matthew 15:14
very sad 😦 for them. my hope is in the LORD and my prayer is to HIM who will convict them and lead them to the TRUTH who saves.
thank you.
Dear Rose.
Sabbath Shalom.
You wrote:
Ivar, for a while, i have been grasping for word/words to describe some people i meet who are difficult to bring to JESUS our savior and mediator. indeed, you are right – “bible believing persons who are not born again christians” – nails it!
My comment:
Without the light of the Holy Spirit, the Bible can become “dry” knowledge. There will be a difference betewwn those who have surrendered and are wiling to obey Jesus the Messiah, and those who want to pick and chose verses, and follow their own faith. If you obey, the scriptures will become alive in your life. You will experience a joy, and peace, that no man can take from you. Amen.
Great article, as always, Ivar.
I just got an allergic reaction to the last phrase, ‘Master Jesus’.
Of course we can use that expression, (though I much prefer ‘Lord’). It’s just that the New Age “Master Jesus” is something completely different. That impostor is supposedly not the same as “the Christ”, whose name is instead “Maitreya”.
This New age “Master Jesus” is supposedly a disciple of the Christ Maitreya, and supposedly ‘borrowed’ the ‘Christ Consciousness’ in his earthly life, by means of ‘overshadowing’, and that the Christ consciousness has overshadowed others, before and after ‘Jesus’!
When the New Age Christ, Maitreya reveals himself openly, he will be accompanied by a handful of other ‘elevated masters’, among which the ‘Master Jesus’ is only one.
And while Maitreya will take om the world – ‘Master Jesus’ is supposed to take over leadership of the christian churches. He is also reported to already exist, and work behind the scenes in Rome!
Of course, I know you were not referring to this blasphemous impostor, but find it worth wile mentioning anyway.
Keep up the good work. : )