Benny Hinn was invited by Ulf Ekman to open an European Word of Faith Conference in Sweden.
Both Ulf Ekman and Benny Hinn are Word of Faith teachers. But during the last years, Hinn and Ekman has moved their theology in two different directions.
While Ekman has managed to over jump even his Lutheran roots, and promotes end time unity with Rome, Hinn has started to get new “super revelations” from God.
From the stage in Sweden, Hinn told the audience that the blood of Jesus was not from his Jewish mother, and other strange new, completely unknown doctrines.
Hinns performance on stage left his Swedish host red faced. To the Swedish daily, Ulf Ekman stated: Some of the teaching of Benny Hinn is pure gnosticism. On Ekmans blog, he warned his readers not to believe all Hinn said, but rather read the Bible.
The flip side of the coin, is that Ekman is the man who invited Hinn to open the European Faith conference. Ekman has also for many years been a student of Faith teachers like Oral Roberts and Kenneth Hagin.
If Ulf Ekman ever reachers the Kingdom of Heaven, He was able to repent. Because the souls he has mislead, runs the risk of not making it into the eternal kingdom.
Source: Swedish Christian Daily, dagen.se.
ivarfjeld.com 
Ugh. I just wrote a post about people like Hinn: http://theologigal.wordpress.com/2010/07/27/dont-believe-everything-you-hear/
If people actually read the Bible then people like Hinn wouldn’t have such a large following.
If you actually read the Bible you wouldn’t make such a large mistakes. When you read Mk. 12. 35- 37…
“How is it that the scribes say that the Christ is the Son of David? 36 For David himself said by the Holy Spirit:
The LORD said to my Lord,
Sit at My right hand,
Till I make Your enemies Your footstool.
37 Therefore David himself calls Him ‘Lord’; how is He then his Son?”
…what is your and all you critics conclusion?
We don’t read in the Bible that Jesus ever called Mary a mother, and the only way that He could be a son of David is thru the Mary, so?
Moreover, your article states that B. Hinn said in Sweden;
“the blood of Jesus was not from his Jewish mother”,
but below his photo you have put a ‘title’;
“Benny Hinn denies that Jesus has come in flesh, not having human blood.”
Do you think that these two quoted sentences are equal or the second arises from the first? I don’t think so at all!
Who is deluded then, or even worse – a liar?
Greetings from Poland:)
Dear Rafal from Poland.
Shalom, and thanks for commenting on this blog.
Jesus had the right to be called a Son of David through his earthly father Joseph Son of David. This fulfills the prophetic Word.
The issue with Benny Hinn in Sweden was the blood of Jesus. Hinn claims the blood of Jesus is not from his mother Mary. That is wrong. Mary was a Jewish virgin. The blood of King Messiah came from his mother. Any simple DNA-test would have proven that Hinn is wrong.
Dear Rafael
Shalom, and welcome to this site.
Lets see what the Bible says:
Matthew 1:20
But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit.
Luke 1:27
to a virgin pledged to be married to a man named Joseph, a descendant of David. The virgin’s name was Mary.
Luke 2:4
So Joseph also went up from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, to Bethlehem the town of David, because he belonged to the house and line of David.
John 1:45
Philip found Nathanael and told him, “We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law, and about whom the prophets also wrote—Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.”
(end of scriptures)
Joseph is a son of David. So is his son, Jesus of Nazareth. The carpenters son. Remember that Jesus is also fully man, and is raised in the household of Joseph son of David. Its His earthly father’s house who makes Jesus Jewish. His Heavenly Father is not a Jew.
Nowhere in the Bible, Mary the mother of Jesus is called the daughter of David. She is part of the House of David through her husband, only.
Both of them should repent, and ask God for forgiveness. Benny Hinn is a complete liar, and has Satan’s hold over him. He has used his supposed “visions” to lead people down a wrong path. But yes, if people actually read the bible, they would realize that Benny Hinn is one of many false prophets Jesus Christ speaks about in the bible.
Deu 18:20 But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die.
Mat 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Great blog. Lots of useful information here. I’m wil send it to some friend!
what a load of crap about Ulf ekman not making it into the kingdom of Heaven,you Hypocrite! are you the Judge?
Dear Chris.
Shalom, and welcome to this site.
I have never said that Ulf Ekman will not make it through the narrow gate. I have written that he will not do so, if he does not repent. This was the same message given my John the Baptists. He was not their final judge. But he called people brood of vipers, and warned them that they would not be able to escape the coming wrath of God.
first of all benny hinn ain’t a false prophet.from my limited understanding of theology man inherited sinful nature from Adam and that’s why every man is born a sinner including Mary,meaning if Jesus had been carrying Mary’s blood he would have been a sinner nt a Savior. Jesus’ blood ws from the Spirit because had it been from man it couldnt save man because man couldnt save himself. Jesus cme as a human because it ws man who sinned. also DNA is known as paternity test not maternity meaning father provides the blood and there z no argument on who his Father ws.Also makin a doctrinal mistake doesnt make one a false prophet.
theo-crat,
How do you know Benny Hinn isn’t a false prophet? If you picked up the Word of God, you would immediately see that he is a fake.
This is just one of the things that prove Benny Hinn needs to repent.
In Dec of 189 at Orlando Christian Center, Benny said: “The Spirit tells me – Fidel Castro will die – in the 90’s. Oooh my! Some will try to kill him and they will not succeed. But there will come a change in his physical health, and he will not stay in power, and Cuba will be visited of God.”
Fidel Castro is still alive and kicking. Not only that but Ivar has written great articles-on Benny Hinn and the false holy spirit that lives in his church.
The Bible tells us: 1 John 4:1 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world.
Gloria
Biologically Jesus had to have Mary’s blood. That’s the part that made him human. He was concieved by the Holy Spirit and not of his father Joseph. So, physically Jesus did not share the blood of Joseph. And in Jewish history, the blood of the father is what passes on sin. So Jesus was sinless due to him having his mother’s blood and not his father’s blood.
Spiritually Jesus was born of a human woman and “fathered” by the Holy Spirit which in turn makes God the Father Jesus’ father. Now how does that reconcile that Jesus be in the “bloodline of David”. I know others may not agree, but Mary is also in the blood line of David. And Joseph being his male parent gave Jesus all the same rights to the Davidic bloodline as was foretold.
All problems solved. History and God’s Word line up again.
gloria failing in the gift of prophecy doesn’t make u a false prophet,there z a difference between Old and New Testament prophecy. If u look at all the modern day prophets at one time or another they uttered ‘falsely’ because a gift from God is perfected.Man is fallible bt as we know God more we will be perfected.
Dear theo-crat.
Shalom, and welcome to this site.
I want you to show me from scripture, where it is mentioned that God has changed His instruction’s for His prophets.
My best guess is that it is wise to obey the Word of God. If what a claimed to be a prophet says will happen, does not take place, He will forever be a con man. Not to be trusted, and never again to be given any importance inside a fellowship of believers.
There is plenty of falsehood inside Churches, and not numbered claimed to be Christians who never learn from their mistakes.
Isaiah 44:24-26
“This is what the LORD says—
your Redeemer, who formed you in the womb:
I am the LORD,
the Maker of all things,
who stretches out the heavens,
who spreads out the earth by myself,
who foils the signs of false prophets
and makes fools of diviners,
who overthrows the learning of the wise
and turns it into nonsense,
who carries out the words of his servants
and fulfills the predictions of his messengers,
who says of Jerusalem, ‘It shall be inhabited,’
of the towns of Judah, ‘They shall be rebuilt,’
and of their ruins, ‘I will restore them,’
ivarfield, it isnt explicitly written but look at Agabus and how he told Paul and Barnabas the prophetic word.he gave them room to choose what they wanted unlike in the Old Testament. Paul says we prophesy in ‘part’ yet the OT says ”NONE OF ELIJAH’S WORDS FELL TO THE GROUND” to me there is a difference.
If the blood of Jesus came from Mary His mother it would be stained with sin! In other words sinful blood!
How could Jesus carry into the holy of holies sinful blood?
How could sinful blood ever make atonement for our sins?
Then I might as well have died for you and your sins!!
Think about it!
Now the Bible records in two places: Acts 20:28 and Hebrews 9:12 that Jesus purchased us and He entered into the holy of holies WITH HIS OWN BLOOD! (Directly from the Father – that is why the bible records “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit.” Luke 1:27
Not the blood of Mary – sorry!
No blood of a mother has ever yet been transported to her child!
Why should it be any different with the blood of Jesus?
If it was the blood of Mary it would be human blood! Sinful blood.
The DNA-test, ivarfjeld, would have proven that Benny Hinn was right!
The title under Benny Hinn’s picture “Benny Hinn denies that Jesus has come in flesh, not having human blood.” is super misleading.
It is taken from the Word of God that says: 1 John 4:2-3
Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
Why then does the Bible say this?
Because if you have based your salvation on a Jesus that has inherited sinful blood, human blood, from His mother Mary, then you don’t believe that Jesus Christ (God) has come in the flesh!
Son of man – flesh from the mother!
Son of God – blood from the Father!
Result – God in human flesh!
The spirit of the antichrist would of course have you believe in blood that can never take away your sin.
Today believe that the blood of Jesus – His Own blood – has washed away your sins forever by one offering. That blood is now in the holy of holies, in heaven itself.
Bottom line: The blood of Jesus is NOT human blood!!
HOW DO YOU PROVE FLESH FROM THE MOTHER???
I DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING!!!
IT SEEMS TO BE A DIVINE MIRACLE!!! I JUST BELIEVE
HE IS THE WAY BECAUSE HE TOLD ME SO!!! THAT
SETTLES IT FOR ME!!!
So you do not have the partial DNA of your mother’s egg? Your umbilical cord was not attached to your mother? She did not supply blood to you as you grew in her womb? For heaven’s sake, I am mearly a high school graduate and I know that all humans get blood directly from the mother. It supplies the baby with nutrients and oxygen as it developes in the womb.
Biologically Jesus had to have Mary’s blood. That’s the part that made him human. He was concieved by the Holy Spirit and not of his father Joseph. So, physically Jesus did not share the blood of Joseph. And in Jewish history, the blood of the father is what passes on sin. So Jesus was sinless due to him having his mother’s blood and not his father’s blood.
Spiritually Jesus was born of a human woman and “fathered” by the Holy Spirit which in turn makes God the Father Jesus’ father. Now how does that reconcile that Jesus be in the “bloodline of David”. I know others may not agree, but Mary is also in the blood line of David. And Joseph being his male parent gave Jesus all the same rights to the Davidic bloodline as was foretold.
All problems solved. History and God’s Word line up again.
1 John 4:3:
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
Amen to John 4:3. Virgin Mary gave Jesus birth through the Holy Spirit. The only blood source Jesus could ever have and had is through His mother. Whoever denies that Jesus Christ did not come in the flesh has a spirit of the Antichrist.
The precious blood of Lord Jesus is divine,cent percent holy which cleanses us from all sins(1 John 1:7).Though Lord Jesus was in the womb of Mary but neither his blood nor blood of Mary passed from one to another.Medical science says that an embryo gets its blood from sperm i.e.from its father.In case of Lord Jesus,Holy Spirit put the WORD OF GOD in Mary’s womb(John 1:14) which turned into embryo and from this WORD OF GOD,divine blood was formed within embryo of Lord Jesus.There is no question of Mary’s blood passing to Jesus.Like all human beings,it was required of Mary to accept Lord Jesus as her personal saviour for forgiveness of her sins.Mary was imperfect like us.Had Mary’s blood mixed with Jesus’ blood,then the blood of Lord Jesus would not have been accepted by GOD,the HEAVENLY FATHER for atonement of sins of all human beings.The blood of LORD JESUS is absolutely pure,sinless and cent percent holy.So Benny Hinn’s comment regarding blood of LORD JESUS is correct.
Dear DEBAJYOTI SARKAR
Shalom.
It is difficult for many to accept the humanity of Jesus. He was a human being just like me and you.
The Bible explains that all who rejects that Jesus was human, has appeared in flesh, walk in the spirit of antichrist. men like Benny Hinn do this. As correctly explained in this article, Hinn present and follow a copycat, a gnostic “Jesus”.
Jesus was born by a virgin. That means that Jesus has God the Father as His Father. Every part of the baby is determined by the contribution of both parents.
Hebrews 2:14-15
Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity so that by his death he might destroy him who holds the power of death—that is, the devil — and free those who all their lives were held in slavery by their fear of death.
Since Jesus has God the Father as Father, He is also divine. Jesus is fully human and fully God in one person. Truly unique. The blood of Jesus can pay for all sins, because Jesus shared 100 per cent our humanity. The blood of Jesus can cleans us from all sins, because Jesus never sinned. No man has ever done that. No man will ever be able to copy the life, death and atoning sacrifice of Jesus the Messiah.
First drop of blood in a foetus is created from the sperm of its father and not from its mother.Then from the first drop of blood,more blood is created.Though the embryo receives nutrition from its mother through placenta but neither the blood of the embryo nor blood of its mother pass from one to another.Medical science holds this view.Lord Jesus was formed in Mary’s womb through the WORD OF GOD planted by the HOLY SPIRIT and the same WORD OF GOD formed divine blood in Jesus.As I have already explained,neither blood of Lord Jesus flowed to Mary nor Mary’s blood flowed to Jesus.Mary’s blood was sinful which did not contaminate the cent percent pure blood of Lord Jesus.It is absolutely true that Lord Jesus was cent percent human and cent percent GOD but that does not mean he had blood of Mary.Lord Jesus was human in the sense that he felt tired,felt hunger,slept like human beings.He passed through all difficulties as we pass(Hebrew 2:18) but he never sinned.He kept His pure blood sinless till the last moment of His life.
Dear DEBAJYOTI SARKAR
Shalom.
There is no humanity without blood. Because life is in the blood. Jesus the Messiah came in flesh and blood just like all other humans.
Galatians 4:4 (King James)
But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law.
Galatians 4:4
(Amplified Bible)
But when the proper time had fully come, God sent His Son, born of a woman, born subject to [the regulations of] the Law.
To write off the humanity of Jesus, can be dome by the rejection of his blood. His blood was made holy, as an acceptable atonement for sins, because He did not sin. Not because his blood was not human.
God of the Bible was not the Father of rams and bulls. Still he accepted this blood as an atoning sacrifice for sins. The perfection of Jesus is His sinless life. Not your claim, that His blood was not human blood.
So you do not have the partial DNA of your mother’s egg? Your umbilical cord was not attached to your mother? She did not supply blood to you as you grew in her womb? For heaven’s sake, I am mearly a high school graduate and I know that all humans get blood directly from the mother. It supplies the baby with nutrients and oxygen as it developes in the womb. Yes the blood transfers to the child in the womb.
Biologically Jesus had to have Mary’s blood. That’s the part that made him human. He was concieved by the Holy Spirit and not of his father Joseph. So, physically Jesus did not share the blood of Joseph. And in Jewish history, the blood of the father is what passes on sin. So Jesus was sinless due to him having his mother’s blood and not his father’s blood.
Spiritually Jesus was born of a human woman and “fathered” by the Holy Spirit which in turn makes God the Father Jesus’ father. Now how does that reconcile that Jesus be in the “bloodline of David”. I know others may not agree, but Mary is also in the blood line of David. And Joseph being his male parent gave Jesus all the same rights to the Davidic bloodline as was foretold.
All problems solved. History and God’s Word line up again.
how you imagine visible blood comes to the heaven throne in front of God invisible?
visible blood had run out when the body was put through by roman solder.
so please be more careful- the blood is the soul- so we should speak about invisible blood which is the soul.
and dont forget Jesus came from heaven not from earth-how it could be explain?
simply- Holy spirit taken his spirit into the body of Mary and to be born in flesh and blood from Mary.
But the spirit and soul-from heavens.
we all were in Adam not in Eve.
our spirits comes from Adam throuth fathers. why we are from earth, not from heaven
all this you can find in the bible reading more and more, deviding what is spiritual and what is not but of flesh-visible and not visible , eternal and not eternal.
David: Yuma, Arizona USA
You guys are behind the times; I saw a hotel bill on a documentary whereby Bennie paid $10,000 for one nights stay at a hotel suite on his travels. I’ve been to one of his visits to the Anaheim Con. Center when I lived there. His staff were reading newspapers and smoking behind him hidden by a screen. From my seating, I could see this. It was a charade. We stopped supporting him after that evening. By the way, the Holy Spirit is more respectful than throwing jackets at people. My wife and I are very spirit filled and foreign missionaries doing deliverence work. People fell near us, we felt nothing. The spirit he was giving out wasn’t the one you want, as one person commented.
It takes some of you longer to discern these things than others, sorry.
“The spirit he was giving out wasn’t the one you want.”
Thank you David, for this testimony.
P.s. Have you read Bob DeWaay’s articles on deliverance ministry?
Everyone ministering in deliverance, should read it.
It’s over at ‘Critical Issues Commentary’.
Surely,if the blood of christ came from a fallen race,it wouldn’t have power to save because it would be contaminated with sin,and as such anyone could die for us.That’s why God became flesh,conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost and not through sexual intercourse,to establish a new creation apart from the adamic race.
Biologically Jesus had to have Mary’s blood. That’s the part that made him human. He was concieved by the Holy Spirit and not of his father Joseph. So, physically Jesus did not share the blood of Joseph. And in Jewish history, the blood of the father is what passes on sin. So Jesus was sinless due to him having his mother’s blood and not his father’s blood.
Spiritually Jesus was born of a human woman and “fathered” by the Holy Spirit which in turn makes God the Father Jesus’ father. Now how does that reconcile that Jesus be in the “bloodline of David”. I know others may not agree, but Mary is also in the blood line of David. And Joseph being his male parent gave Jesus all the same rights to the Davidic bloodline as was foretold.
All problems solved. History and God’s Word line up again.
Makasih atas infonya , Adria