Israeli army told not to remove Hamas leadership in Gaza

April 11, 2011

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicated on Sunday that restraint would be “the watchword”.

The leadership in Israel is not willing to use their supreme military to remove the Hamas-regime from Gaza.

“We intend to restore the quiet,” he said. “If that is also Hamas’ intention, quiet will be restored. If Hamas intensifies its attacks … our response will be much more severe.”

Hamas’ deputy defense minister, Ghazi Hamad, made a rare direct appeal to Israel Sunday, calling for a halt to the fighting during an Israel Radio interview he gave in Hebrew.

“We are interested in calm, but we want the Israeli army to stop its attacks,” he said.

The Israel Defense Forces refrained from responding to a rocket fired on Sunday toward Ashkelon and to the 10 mortar shells that hit open areas in southern Israel, even as a ministerial committee directed the army “to continue to act against those responsible for terrorism.”

Sourcre: Israeli Daily Haaretz.

My comment:

The Government of Israel seems to be caught somewhere between the devil and the deep blue sea.

They can not live with a Hamas regime in Gaza, sending hundred plus rockets into Israel.  Neither can they remove Hamas.

Why?

On reason is that there seems to be no one to replace Hamas, but al-Quaeda or Islamic Jihad.

The second reason is that Israel do not want al-Fatah to take over Gaza. That will bring an end to the present “three state solution”, that can never be enforced on Israel.  A sudden re-appearance of al-Fatha (PLO) in Gaza, will quickly lead to International pressure on Israel to surrender Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem.

So the solution is to permit Hamas to send rockets in over Southern Israel, but not to many.  Its seems to be silly. But please tell me the better alternative for men like Benjamin Netanyahu?

If anyone think there will be a “just peace” in the Middle East , they do not understand the complex situation for the Jewish state. When Jesus said Israel would be in deep distress, we who are connected to the Holy Spirit will be able to understand.

Luke 21:23
How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! There will be great distress in the land and wrath against this people.

We do also understand, that Israel will be forced into signing a “peace agreement” with her enemy, that can surely not be trusted. Israel’s Islamic enemies are like a cancer, that no one really knows how to remove. It is deadly.

Written by Ivar


Egypt revolution turns more Islamic, more anti-Israel

April 11, 2011

The revolution in Cairo is starting to take on a more overtly Islamic and anti-Israel flavor.

Egyptians wants another Islamic war against Israel. Jew-hate without end.

For those who thought the Egyptian revolution is done and past, think again.

Former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak may be gone, but the country is currently being ruled by a temporary military regime, which means there are various forces still vying for future control of the Middle East’s largest military power.

And with the world’s attention now diverted elsewhere, the revolution in Cairo is starting to take on a more overtly Islamic and anti-Israel flavor.

Over the weekend, Cairo’s Tahrir Square again filled with angry demonstrators who are still waiting for their full list of demands to be met. Among them was the Muslim Brotherhood, which last week officially announced its intention to take part, as a group, in renewed anti-government protests.

As the demonstration turned increasingly hostile, Egyptian soldiers opened fire, reportedly killing two demonstrators and wounding another 15, according to Cairo hospital officials. The army denied firing live ammunition at the crowd.

Not content with protesting their own new government, the demonstrators also marched on the Israeli embassy in Cairo. Gathered at the gates of the Israeli mission, the angry mob demanded that Egypt cut all ties to the Jewish state and stop supplying Israel with natural gas. They also wanted the Israeli flag flying atop the embassy to be removed.

Source: Israel Today


Barak splits the “political wing” of Hamas from Jihadist’s

April 11, 2011

Hamas attempts to push 750.000 Israelis in bomb shelters.

Ehud Barak seems to slide into an acceptance of "peace talk" with Islamic terrorists.

Ehud Barak is again making waves in Israeli Politics.
“You have the military wing of Hamas that shoots and the political wing that talks,” he said on Sunday.

After Vice Premier Silvan Shalom had rebuked the defense minister in public, Barak changed his statement.

“That isn’t precisely what I meant. I’m not exactly distinguishing between the two, you misunderstood. There is a political wing and there is a military wing but that doesn’t mean that there is any room to distinguish between the two.”

Than Barak underlined: “As far as we’re concerned, Hamas is responsible for everything in the strip and all the organizations that operate there. We will not accept any activities that harm our citizens, actions such as firing at a bus or attempts to put 750,000 citizens in bomb shelters”.

Source: Ynetnews.com

My comment:

Ehud Barak has joined the strategy of Washington. To be able to curb the military wing of Hizb’Allah, the US Government is ready to talk to the elected politicians of the Islamic terrorist organization.

Now a political recognition of Hamas is needed, to be able to find a “peaceful solution”.

You simply have to ask your self?

What was the difference between the political leadership in Nazi-Germany and the military leadership?

Was there anything to talk with Berlin about, as long as Adolf Hitler was leading the Nazi-flock?

The Nazi-rule in Berlin had to be removed. Both the political and the military. A peace treaty with Nazi-Germany in 1943 would not have lasted long. Hitler would just use the “peace” to rearm and continued to fight for World domain.

It is likewise with Hamas and Islamic rule in Gaza. The cancer must not be allowed to spread, but must be removed while deliverance and healing is still possible.

Written by Ivar


“Please turn to Virgin Mary to discover salvation”

April 11, 2011

The Pope explained to faithful Catholics to turn to “Virgin Mary” if they wanted to rediscover her son.

The Pope preach a different gospel, and leads men into a dead end that will lead to death and eternal destruction.

“Christ, in his resurrection, destroyed this “wall of death,” the Pope told those gathered in St. Peter’s Square on Sunday.

This is what the Catholic News Agency (CNA) recorded:

“Pope Benedict concluded his Angelus address with a call for everyone to turn to the Virgin Mary in prayer that she might assist them in discovering salvation in Christ”.

Source: CNA

My comment:

Since the Pope calls the Roman Catholics to “rediscover” salvation, the good news must be hidden for them.

The Vatican often speaks about the “mystery of Christ”.

The truth is that the Pope him self hide the truth about Jesus. And the Pontiff deceives people, by telling those who search for the Messiah to go through His mother.

Because both Jesus and His mother says the radical opposite. You shall go directly to Jesus with all your prayers.  The Jewish mother of Jesus do not want to be a mediator between men and Him. In fact if she tries to be, she will sin against the scriptures.

1 Timothy 2:5

For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.

The Pope is a man of sin. He leads people away from the truth.

Written by Ivar


Saudi Arabia on the brink of violence for “allah”

April 11, 2011

The House of Saud is very nervous that revolution is contagious.

Both President Obama and King Abdullah belives Islam is a religion of "peace".

Relations between Riyadh and Washington have deteriorated sharply as the Saudis have lost faith in American commitments to stand by their friends.

The House of Saud is very nervous that revolution is contagious.

By intervening forcefully in Bahrain, the Saudis have now more or less taken control of the island’s future.

Now they are the power behind the throne. This sends a clear signal to the two Shia powers in the Gulf, Iran and Iraq, not to interfere in the business of the peninsula.

It also sent a clear signal to Obama not to support reform in the kingdom’s backyard.

The Saudi leadership also believes they have seen this American movie before. Jimmy Carter threw the Shah under the bus in 1978 and we got the Islamic Republic of Iran.

George Bush toppled Saddam in 2003 and we got a Shia government in Iraq. So the princes are circling the wagons and telling their fellow monarchs in the Gulf and King Abdallah in Jordan to do the same.

Prince Bandar, former ambassador in Washington, reportedly visited Islamabad late last month to ask the Pakistanis for troops to help ensure internal stability in the kingdom and the Gulf States if needed.

Source: National Interest

My comment:

While the US wants to support Islamic rebels in Libya, Washington is deadly against any instability that might strike Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia neither has freedom, nor democracy. In fact, the Saudi Kingdom is a Middle Age style totalitarian religious Islamic regime, based on Sharia Law.

President Obama has branded Islam as the religion of peace. It is indeed difficult to find anything good about Muslims slaughtering their own brethren in the name of “allah”.

Written by Ivar


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 463 other followers