25.000 Arab Palestinians builds Jewish settlements

For Arab Palestinians, helping building Jewish settlements mean food on the table.

The unfreeze of construction in Israel means more jobs for Arab Palestinians.

Palestinian officials say some 25,000 Palestinians are employed in settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem.

The Palestinian Authority has told Palestinians to quit their jobs in settlements by the end of the year, but compliance could be patchy due to a lack of alternative employment in the West Bank.

In the West Bank village of Hussan near Bethlehem, Ali, a Palestinian builder, spoke of new work opportunities rather than politics when asked about the expiration of Israel’s construction moratorium.

People who help Jews rebuilding Zion will be blessed. May Jesus appear in their life.

“What difference does it make? We have lived with Israelis and we will have to live together in the future. I’m pleased that I will be able to make a living.”

Source: Reuters.

My comment:

Israel are called to treat aliens and strangers with the deepest respect.

Because of the religion of Islam, the majority of Arab Palestinians are hostile towards Jews and the state of Israel.

Still the Jews bless their enemies.

25.000 jobs for Arabs will feed almost a couple of hundred thousand people.

Just like David Ben Guriion said: Please do not leave Zion, or harm us. But stay put, and help us to rebuild the Jewish homeland.

Two million Arabs, most of them Muslims listened to Ben-Gurion. They are Israeli Arabs, living inside Israel with full Israeli citizenship.

Pink Floyd turns to Jew hate to make money

During the next “The Wall Live” tour, Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters will target Israel’s West Bank security fence.

Roger Waters sings about walls, and will use the Pink Floyd band to attack Israel.

On Wednesday the Anti-Defamation League slammed Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters for using what the organization said was anti-Semitic imagery.

Waters will during performances of “Goodbye Blue Sky” on “The Wall Live” tour will target Israel’s West Bank security fence. He has for a long time been using imagery long associated with stereotypes about Jews and money, the ADL said. An animated scene projects images of planes dropping bombs in the shape of Jewish Stars of David followed by dollar signs, the organization said.

ADL National Director Abraham Foxman in a statement called the juxtaposition “outrageous.”

95 per cent ot the "wall" around Israel is a fence. Effectivly it has ended Islamic suicide bombers from killing Jews.

“While [Rogers] insists that his intent was to criticize Israel’s West Bank security fence, the use of such imagery in a concert setting seems to leave the message open to interpretation. But the meaning could easily be misunderstood as a comment about Jews and money,” Foxman said in the statement.

“We wish that Waters had chosen some other way to convey his political views without playing into and dredging up the worst age-old anti-Semitic stereotype about Jews and their supposed obsession with making money,” Foxman adde.

Source: Jerusalem Post.

My comment:

Pink Floyd’s attack on Israel is a complete falsehood.

The so-called wall is not a wall. 95 per cent of it is a security fence that was set up to stop Islamic suicide bombers to enter into Jewish dominant areas of Israel and kill innocent Jews.

The part of the security fence that is a wall, is set up around Jerusalem. Her there is a need for a wall, to stop sniper fire on cars and busses.

To reducible the state of Israel for setting up this security fence, is injustice. Because no person in the whole World was able to come up with a better idea of how to stop Islamic terrorists to create havoc inside Israel.

And the best part of it: The security fence brought an end to Islamic human suicide bombs exploding inside Israel.

I guess that is why Pink Floyd is so offended by this Israeli success. It exposed the evil motive of peoples heart.

General: “We Israeli’s must hold on to our territory”

If we give up the West Bank, Hamas or Hizbullah will move rockets close to Ben Gurion Airport.

Israeli Major General Giora Eiland warns the Israelis not to give up land for peace.

This the warning from retired Israeli Major General Giora Eiland.

How do we resolve the dilemma of a peace agreement that includes handing over the Golan Heights to the Syrians, while facing the fact that Israel cannot be defended without the Golan Heights?

The way around this was supposed to be the inclusion in any peace agreement of specific security arrangements. Yet this approach was based on a number of assumptions, all of them misguided.

Events over the past ten years have also revealed a marked change in the types of threats to be expected from a Palestinian state or from the existing Palestinian entity. This involves a switch to three types of weaponry that all fundamentally contradict the guidelines discussed for security arrangements.

Rockets and missiles positioned throughout the West Bank would easily cover the entire State of Israel. Advanced anti-aircraft missiles would be capable of shooting down not only large passenger aircraft flying into Ben-Gurion International Airport, but also helicopters and even fighter planes. Anti-tank missiles that are highly effective up to a range of 5 km. can easily cover not only strategic positions such as Israel’s north-south Highway 6, but well beyond.

The common denominator among all of these is the ease of smuggling and clandestine manufacture, as is taking place today in Gaza. No monitoring system that may be established will be able to prevent this. Only effective control of the Jordan Valley along the Israeli-Jordanian border can prevent the smuggling of these types of weapons.

In addition, if Israel were to withdraw to the 1949 armistice lines, then the area to the east of the Israel-Palestine border would be home not only to the Palestinian Authority, but to other potential enemies too, including Hizbullah and Syria. This means that in determining security arrangements in the West Bank, the approach must be broader, beyond Israel’s needs vis-à-vis only the Palestinians.

Source: Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.

The eternal UN Arabian refugee welfare camps

Sixty years after the first Arab-Israeli war “refugee camps” accurately should be defined as a UN-administered, quasi-apartheid, welfare ghetto.

Crocodile tears and laziness has paid off for the so-called "Palestinian" people. Your tax money is paying the bills.

The Balata refugee camp with its 20,000 residents is inside the West Bank city of Nablus – that is, within the jurisdiction of the Palestinian Authority.

Most of Balata’s current residents are the children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren of the original refugees. Thus, a new baby born in Balata today is still designated by the UN as a refugee dislocated by the 1948 Arab-Israeli war and hence entitled to substantial material benefits for life, or at least until the conflict is settled.

In UN schools and cultural clubs financed by American tax dollars, Balata’s children, like the children in similar camps in Gaza and neighboring Arab countries, are nurtured on the myth that someday soon they will return in triumph to their ancestors’ homes.

While awaiting redemption, Balata’s Palestinian residents are prohibited, by the Palestinian Authority, from building homes outside the camp’s official boundaries. They do not vote on municipal issues and receive no PA funding for roads or sanitation.

Source: Sol Stern in Jewish Ideas Daily.

My comment:

Many people on Earth have been refugees. The majority of the people who left Europe 200 years ago had hardly anything in their pockets.

But they all have one thing in common. They started all over again. And they were eventually granted citizenship.

If would have been quite pathetic if there had been “European” refuge camps in Australia today, living on aid from United Nations.

When “aid” is dropped on your doorstep, why at all seek a job?

The “Palestinian refugee problem” is the longest UN sponsorship of people, who will loos their aid the moment they become citizens of any Arab country.

Because that is what they should have been given. After being defeated royally in five wars in a bid to destroy the Jewish nation, they should finally had been able to see the writing on the wall.

Muslim brethren should have taken the burden the UN is carrying today, more than 30 years ago.

Why harass the Jewish people?

Would not Muslims be better off living in proper Muslim nations?