Vatican snubbed Irish police inquiry into Catholic priests sex abuse of children

The inquiry into sex abuse by Catholic priests in Ireland has disclosed that the Vatican ignored formal requests for information.

The Cardinals are old wicked men. The list of sexual crimes within this priesthood is a never ending story.

The inquiry asked for details of reports on abuse sent to the Vatican by the Dublin archdiocese in 2006. The Vatican did not reply but told the Irish Foreign Affairs department the request «had not gone through appropriate diplomatic channels». The inquiry condemned church leaders for covering-up abuse for decades.

The Report of the Commission of Investigation into the Catholic Archdiocese of Dublin, which was published on Thursday, covered a period from 1975 to 2004. The commission said it was independent of the government and therefore did not regard it as appropriate to use diplomatic channels when seeking information.

A request for information from the Papal Nuncio also was ignored. In February 2007, the commission wrote to the Dublin-based Papal Nuncio asking him to forward all relevant documents in his possession. It also requested that he confirm whether he had any such documents but the Papal Nuncio did not reply.

Earlier this year, the commission again failed to receive a reply after sending the Papal Nuncio extracts from its draft report which referred to him and his office, as it was required to do.

A senior Vatican spokesman said diplomatic practice required that outside requests made to the governance of the Vatican pass through diplomatic channels, in this case the Department of Foreign Affairs in Dublin and the Irish Embassy to the Holy See in Rome.

The leader of the Catholic Church in Ireland has said he is deeply sorry and ashamed by the child abuse the report had revealed. Cardinal Sean Brady also apologized for the way the Church covered-up the crimes.

The report also found that on occasions senior police officers colluded in the cover-up. The commissioner of the Irish police, Fachtna Murphy, apologised for the police failure to protect victims.

Victims groups are now calling for a similar inquiry to take place in every diocese in Ireland. However, the Auxiliary Bishop of Dublin Eamonn Walsh has said he does not believe that should happen. He said it would be better for the Church to use its «time, energy and money» to improve child protection measures.

Source: BBC.

My comment:

When the Pope denies the Roman Catholic priests to marry, he do not only go against the Word of God. He also creates a priesthood of men that behind closed doors will burn with passion for each other.

Many Catholic priest looks after children, in school and Catholic institutions. The list of child abuse and sexual crimes against minors are as long and wide as the road that leads to death and destruction. And the Pope and the Vatican always to their best to cover up the crimes of the priesthood.

In many Catholic parishes, there are priest who have secret lovers. Either men or women. The Roman Catholics knows this is the truth, but they are to ashamed to talk about the tragic affairs of a Church that has created a priesthood that serves Satan.

Jerusalem Post Column One blasts Netanyahu for weakening Israel

Netanyahu’s moves on the issue of prisoner swap and Jewish settlements have already weakened the country considerably.

Benjamin Netanyahu has seen better days. Under pressure from Obama, he gave in to Islamic demands, before the Arabs recognized Israels right to exist.

This is the conclusion made by Caroline Glick, who is a columnist in Jerusalem Post. Glick is a Zionist that has been favoring the Likud party in her comments on security issues. Now she gives the strongest warnings possible to Netanyahu for giving in to pressure from Obama and the Muslim World.

Her are some of her viewpoints:

«So far from winning American support or at least causing the White House to ease its bullying, US President Barack Obama sees Netanyahu’s decision to implement a militarily irrational, bigoted policy of prohibiting Jews from building in Israel’s heartland as a drop in the bucket».

«The truth is that Israel should not be in the business of negotiating the right of Israeli cities and villages to exist and prosper. The notion that it is acceptable to demand that Jews not be permitted to live in Judea and Samaria – or anywhere else in the world – is not a notion that Israel should countenance»

«Were Israel to see 20 Arab embassies opening in exchange for a temporary freeze in Jewish construction, one could say that Netanyahu’s massive concession was justified».

«Simply by agreeing to negotiate with Hamas, Netanyahu conferred legitimacy not only on the terror group, but on the act of taking hostages».

«Netanyahu’s moves on the issue to date have already weakened the country considerably».

«Netanyahu’s willingness to release murderers from prison also signs the death warrants of countless Israelis».

«Unlike Netanyahu, the Palestinians are playing their cards wisely. Why should they accept his move as sufficient when they know the Americans will demand still more concessions from him?»

My comment:

Last time Benyamin Netanyahu was Prime Minister of Israel, He gave Hebron into the hands of Islam. This time He is willing to give up Zionism it self.

The day the Jewish nations agree that Jews are not permitted to live in Judea and Samaria, we will see the beginning of the end of the Jewish state of Israel.

Radical Islam, terror, lies and cheating have paid off. As the columnist correctly asks:

How can an Israeli Prime Minister in principle agree to make any part of the World, a Jew-free zone?

The US, the Europan Union, Russia and China do not understand the consequences of the dirty game they are playing on the Israeli Government. They now give us the same message, and the same political solutions, that the Nazis was promoting in the 1930-ties.